Insights on Effective Risk Management: Balancing Partnership and Independence

Imagine two climbers scaling a steep mountain, bound by a rope, moving in sync to conquer each challenge. One leads with precision, securing anchors, while the other provides steadfast support. This imagery encapsulates the essence of partnerships in risk management, where collaboration and unity conquer uncertainties.

Conversely, picture a lone figure like Batman, surveying the vast expanse of Gotham City. Armed with knowledge and experience, he embodies independence, relying on his autonomy and accountability. These contrasting images represent the dual nature of risk management – partnership and independence.

The dichotomy of risk management models

In contemporary risk management, these two concepts are often manifested in different models.

The traditional model, exemplified by Batman, adheres to the three lines of defence, with risk management occupying the second line.

Here, risk managers, like vigilant overseers, maintain control and oversight to ensure potential threats are identified and mitigated. This model emphasises independence, where risk managers operate autonomously, making decisions based on their expertise.

However, in 2020, the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) proposed a paradigm shift.

They suggested that risk management should not merely play a defensive role but actively collaborate with business units to drive objectives forward. This led to the consolidation of the first and second lines into a unified “management” line of defence.

In this model, the first line contributes invaluable business acumen, creating a synergy that traditional structures might lack.

This approach underscores the importance of partnership, where risk management becomes a collaborative effort, integrating insights from various stakeholders.

Understanding risk personas

To navigate the complexities of risk management, it’s essential to understand the concept of risk personas. Risk personas are archetypes that represent different approaches to risk-taking and decision-making.

Consider three distinct scenarios: an engineer meticulously designing an airplane, a referee making calls in a high-stakes basketball game, and a Formula 1 driver like Lewis Hamilton taking calculated risks on the track. Each scenario demands a different risk persona: detail-oriented for the engineer, risk-averse for the referee, and risk-taking for the driver.

There are five primary risk personas: risk-averse, balanced, risk-taking, risk-seeking, and detail-oriented.

Each persona has unique traits that can be effective under different circumstances. For instance, a risk-averse individual might excel in regulatory compliance, ensuring adherence to stringent standards.

In contrast, a risk-taking persona might thrive in innovative projects, pushing boundaries to achieve breakthroughs.

Crafting a balanced leadership team

The composition of a senior leadership team significantly impacts an organisation’s risk management approach. For a global insurer, a balanced team might include risk-averse, balanced and risk-taking individuals, ensuring a comprehensive perspective on political, regulatory, and personnel risks. Conversely, a tech start-up might prioritise risk-takers and seekers, focusing on innovation and product development.

Ultimately, there is no definitive “right” or “wrong” line-up for a leadership team. The key is to avoid groupthink where the entire teams leans towards a single risk persona.

By integrating risk intelligence into the evaluation process, organisations can enhance the effectiveness of their decision-making.

A good case study to explore is the Beoing 787 incidents, the critical shift in leadership to a cost based culture, diminished the previously engineering first focused. This led to the erosion of shareholder values and long term competitiveness. Imagine if Boeing had used risk personas and fostered stronger partnerships. It might have spotted potential problems earlier and altered ways how decisions are made.

Merging partnership and independence

Effective risk management requires a nuanced understanding of both partnership and independence. By examining individual and team risk personas and incorporating risk intelligence, organisations can navigate uncertainties with greater confidence.

Ultimately, mastering risk management means being able to flex your risk personas and adapt alongside the ever-changing risk landscape. A unique capability for actuaries and CROs to explore and adapt in practice to navigate the unpredictable terrain of risk management.

CPD: Actuaries Institute Members can claim two CPD points for every hour of reading articles on Actuaries Digital.